Artificial neural networks in medicine

In the past several decades, the intricate neural networks of the human brain have inspired the further development of intelligent systems. Many disciplines, including the complex field of medicine, have taken advantage of the useful applications of artificial neural networks (ANNs). To review and provide a comprehensive introduction to artificial neural networks, as well as a general discussion of its recent applications in the medical field. A search of the PsycINFO, Google Scholar, PubMed, and University of Rhode Island Library databases from 1943 to 2017 was conducted for articles on artificial neural networks to describe (1) general introduction, (2) historical overview, (3) modern innovations, (4) current clinical applications, and (5) future applications of the field. The relevance of artificial neural networks has increased significantly over the past few decades as technology advances. Evidence from several studies demonstrates that artificial neural networks can be used to not only aid in the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of major diseases, but can also aid in the advancement of the environment and community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic €32.70 /Month

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Similar content being viewed by others

Artificial Neural Networks in Biomedicine Applications

Chapter © 2015

Machine Learning, Deep Learning and Neural Networks

Chapter © 2022

Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence

Chapter © 2020

Explore related subjects

References

  1. Koch C. Computation and the single neuron. Nature. 1997;385(6613):207–10. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Basheer IA, Hajmeer M. Artificial neural networks: fundamentals, computing, design. and application Journal of microbiological methods. 2000;43(1):3–31. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Fain GL. Molecular and cellular physiology of neurons. Harvard University Press, 1999.
  4. Brodal P. The central nervous system: structure and function. Oxford University Press, 2004.
  5. Jain AK, Mao J, Mohiuddin KM. Artificial neural networks: a tutorial. Computer. 1996;29(3):31–44. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Papik K, Molnar B, Schaefer R, Dombovari Z, Tulassay Z, Feher J. Application of neural networks in medicine-a review. Med Sci Monit. 1998;4(3):MT538–46. Google Scholar
  7. Abraham TH. Integrating mind and brain: Warren S. McCulloch, cerebral localization, and experimental epistemology. Endeavour. 2003;27(1):32–6. ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Yao X. Evolving artificial neural networks. Proc IEEE. 1999;87(9):1423–47. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Marsalli M.. McCulloch-Pitts Neurons. In The 2008 Annual Meeting of the consortium on cognitive science instruction (ccsi) 2006, (pp. 172–179).
  10. Abraham TH. (Physio) logical circuits: the intellectual origins of the McCulloch–Pitts neural networks. J Hist Behav Sci. 2002;38(1):3–25. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. McCulloch WS, Pitts W. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. The bulletin of mathematical biophysics. 1943;5(4):115–33. ArticleMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Piccinini G. The first computational theory of mind and brain: a close look at mcculloch and pitts's “logical calculus of ideas immanent in nervous activity”. Synthese. 2004;141(2):175–215. ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. Rosenblatt F. The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychol Rev. 1958;65(6):386. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Gardner MW, Dorling SR. Artificial neural networks (the multilayer perceptron)—a review of applications in the atmospheric sciences. Atmos Environ. 1998;32(14):2627–36. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Minsky M, Papert S. Perceptrons, 1969.
  16. Garson GD. Neural networks: An introductory guide for social scientists. Sage, 1998.
  17. Hopfield JJ. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 1982:2554–8.
  18. Rojas R Neural Networks. Book. Springer-Verlag. Berlin, 1996. Retrieved from: https://page.mi.fu-berlin.de/rojas/neural/chapter/K13.pdf
  19. Aiyer SV, Niranjan M, Fallside F. A theoretical investigation into the performance of the Hopfield model. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 1990;1(2):204–15. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Rabuñal JR (Ed.). Artificial neural networks in real-life applications. IGI Global, 2005.
  21. Soumya CV, Ahmed M. Artificial neural network based identification and classification of images of Bharatanatya gestures. In Innovative Mechanisms for Industry Applications (ICIMIA), 2017, 2017 International Conference on (pp. 162–166). IEEE.
  22. Farhat NH, Psaltis D, Prata A, Paek E. Optical implementation of the Hopfield model. Appl Opt. 1985;24:1469–75. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Lesnik KL. Consider the Community: Developing Predictive Linkages between Community Structure and Performance in Microbial Fuel Cells (Doctoral dissertation), 2017.
  24. Yoon, Y., & Swales, G. (1991). Predicting stock price performance: A neural network approach. In System Sciences, 1991. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on (Vol. 4, pp. 156–162). IEEE.
  25. Raza K. Prediction of Stock Market performance by using machine learning techniques, (2017) International Conference on Innovations in Electrical Engineering and Computational Technologies (ICIEECT), Karachi, 2017, pp. 1–1.
  26. Huang W, Nakamori Y, Wang SY. Forecasting stock market movement direction with support vector machine. Comput Oper Res. 2005;32(10):2513–22. ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Itchhaporia D, Snow PB, Almassy RJ, Oetgen WJ. Artificial neural networks: current status in cardiovascular medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28(2):515–21. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Baxt WG. Application of artificial neural networks to clinical medicine. Lancet. 1995;346(8983):1135–8. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Lisboa PJ, Taktak AF. The use of artificial neural networks in decision support in cancer: a systematic review. Neural Netw. 2006;19(4):408–15. ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Ravdin PM, Clark GM, Hilsenbeck SG, et al. A demonstration that breast cancer recurrence can be predicted by neural network analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1992;21(1):47–53. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Hamamoto I, Okada S, Hashimoto T, Wakabayashi H, Maeba T, Maeta H. Prediction of the early prognosis of the hepatectomized patient with hepatocellular carcinoma with a neural network. Comput Biol Med. 1995;25(1):49–59. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Gurney JW, Swensen SJ. Solitary pulmonary nodules: determining the likelihood of malignancy with neural network analysis. Radiology. 1995;196(3):823–9. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Ritchings RT, McGillion M, Moore CJ. Pathological voice quality assessment using artificial neural networks. Med Eng Phys. 2002;24(7):561–4. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Nowikiewicz T, Wnuk P, Małkowski B, Kurylcio A, Kowalewski J, Zegarski W. Application of artificial neural networks for predicting presence of non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph node biopsies. Archives of Medical Science : AMS. 2017;13(6):1399–407. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Dolz J, Massoptier L, Vermandel M. Segmentation algorithms of subcortical brain structures on MRI for radiotherapy and radiosurgery: a survey. IRBM. 2015;36(4):200–12. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Gabor AJ, Seyal M. Automated interictal EEG spike detection using artificial neural networks. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992;83(5):271–80. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Salinsky M, Kanter R, Dasheiff RM. Effectiveness of multiple EEGs in supporting the diagnosis of epilepsy: an operational curve. Epilepsia. 1987;28(4):331–4. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Webber WRS, Litt B, Lesser RP, Fisher RS, Bankman I. Automatic EEG spike detection: what should the computer imitate? Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993;87(6):364–73. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Magnotta VA, Heckel D, Andreasen NC, Cizadlo T, Corson PW, Ehrhardt JC, et al. Measurement of brain structures with artificial neural networks: two-and three-dimensional applications. Radiology. 1999;211(3):781–90. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Shioji M, Yamamoto T, Ibata T, Tsuda T, Adachi K, Yoshimura N. Artificial neural networks to predict future bone mineral density and bone loss rate in Japanese postmenopausal women. BMC Research Notes. 2017;10:590. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Arbabi V, Pouran B, Campoli G, Weinans H, Zadpoor AA. Determination of the mechanical and physical properties of cartilage by coupling poroelastic-based finite element models of indentation with artificial neural networks. J Biomech. 2016;49:631–7. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Lin CC, Ou YK, Chen SH, Liu YC, Lin J. Comparison of artificial neural network and logistic regression models for predicting mortality in elderly patients with hip fracture. Injury. 2010;41(8):869–73. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Lisboa PJ. A review of evidence of health benefit from artificial neural networks in medical intervention. Neural Netw. 2002;15(1):11–39. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Kojuri J, Boostani R, Dehghani P, Nowroozipour F, Saki N. Prediction of acute myocardial infarction with artificial neural networks in patients with nondiagnostic electrocardiogram. Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research. 2015;6(2):51–9. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Bhalerao S, Gunjal B. Hybridization of Improved K-Means and Artificial Neural Network for Heart Disease Prediction.
  46. Tourassi GD, Floyd CE, Sostman HD, Coleman RE. Artificial neural network for diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: effect of case and observer selection. Radiology. 1995;194(3):889–93. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Er O, Yumusak N, Temurtas F. Chest diseases diagnosis using artificial neural networks. Expert Syst Appl. 2010;37(12):7648–55. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Ashizawa K, Ishida T, MacMahon H, Vyborny CJ, Katsuragawa S, Doi K. Artificial neural networks in chest radiography: application to the differential diagnosis of interstitial lung disease. Acad Radiol. 1999;6(1):2–9. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Patil S, Henry JW, Rubenfire M, Stein PD. Neural network in the clinical diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. Chest. 1993;104(6):1685–9. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Tokar AS, Johnson PA. Rainfall-runoff modeling using artificial neural networks. J Hydrol Eng. 1999;4(3):232–9. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Dawson CW, Wilby RL. Hydrological modelling using artificial neural networks. Prog Phys Geogr. 2001;25(1):80–108. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Neural-network-based classification of cognitively normal, demented. Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia from single photon emission with computed tomography image data from brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(12):5530–4. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Mccullagh HJ. An investigation of the predictive accuracy of salinity forecast using the source IMS for the Murray-Darling river, 2016.
  54. Haykin SO. Neural networks and working machines. Book. 2008, Retrieved from: https://www.pearsonhighered.com/assets/samplechapter/0/1/3/1/0131471392.pdf

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Scottsdale, AZ, USA Jack M. Haglin
  2. University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA Genesis Jimenez
  3. Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 70 Ship Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA Adam E. M. Eltorai
  1. Jack M. Haglin